Hello there Facebook and
Blogger world. So, it has been occurring to me that the car industry is not
really interested in making cars for the small crowd like me. A few cases in
close: Back in 2003, Infiniti as well as some other Japanese manufacturers made
interesting, driver focused cars with manual trannies with optional automatic transmission.
Take for example the Q50, which started out as the Infiniti G35 sedan and coveted Motor Trend 2003 Car of the Year G35 coupe. The coupe was available with standard V-6 power, a 6-speed manual, rear or all wheel drive, great shifting action, decent in the snow, and great acceleration.
This car has evolved into the Q50, which in turn is NO longer available with any kind of manual; the closest you can get here in the States is the standard 7 speed auto with paddle shifters on the S package. It also handles much worse than the G35 did. No driving excitement there, except for the Q’s still relatively frivolous acceleration, clocking in at around 5 seconds to sixty. Techie, yes, but is that what Infiniti customers really want? What happened to the lesser expensive, manual transmission car that we had for those precious few years? At least make a manual a cost, stripper based option, and give it another gear or two (8
Take for example the Q50, which started out as the Infiniti G35 sedan and coveted Motor Trend 2003 Car of the Year G35 coupe. The coupe was available with standard V-6 power, a 6-speed manual, rear or all wheel drive, great shifting action, decent in the snow, and great acceleration.
This car has evolved into the Q50, which in turn is NO longer available with any kind of manual; the closest you can get here in the States is the standard 7 speed auto with paddle shifters on the S package. It also handles much worse than the G35 did. No driving excitement there, except for the Q’s still relatively frivolous acceleration, clocking in at around 5 seconds to sixty. Techie, yes, but is that what Infiniti customers really want? What happened to the lesser expensive, manual transmission car that we had for those precious few years? At least make a manual a cost, stripper based option, and give it another gear or two (8
I can’t explain it.
Also, back in 2011,
Mazda announced the end of the most unique car of the 21st century.
The RX-8 was quirky, practical, idiosyncratic, quick, weak on torque, had kind
of a loud exhaust, and very much a driver’s car for the everyday world.
Not a car for "Everyman," and not a car for those low on common sense (see any RX-8 user forum online, and you will see) it was. It was also fast however, very fast for a car with 240 horsepower and ~150 pound feet of torque. It looked great too. Mazda executives talked about a replacement, but development of the mass market CX-5 took center stage instead, as well as the company’s all new 3 and 6 sedans. We can still hear you spin in your grave, you dirty little Rotary engine. With smart engineering and head-turner looks, it could again be a world-class sports car. That was 3 years ago, and nothing out of Mazda factories has replaced it.
Not a car for "Everyman," and not a car for those low on common sense (see any RX-8 user forum online, and you will see) it was. It was also fast however, very fast for a car with 240 horsepower and ~150 pound feet of torque. It looked great too. Mazda executives talked about a replacement, but development of the mass market CX-5 took center stage instead, as well as the company’s all new 3 and 6 sedans. We can still hear you spin in your grave, you dirty little Rotary engine. With smart engineering and head-turner looks, it could again be a world-class sports car. That was 3 years ago, and nothing out of Mazda factories has replaced it.
Honda had the S2000 for a whole decade, and its
performance was even better than the wonderful RX-8 at the time with its
incredible performance numbers and crazy top speed, nailing the 150 mph barrier
even for the smaller 2-liter engine without the use of any forced induction.
OK, that’s nice you may say, but here’s the catch. When you see one on the
road, it looks futuristic. It doesn’t look or sounds like a Honda. It doesn't drive anything like an Accord or Civic or whatnot. No, rather it is just a purpose-driven 150 mph missile of a sports car.
Except for a Porsche or maybe the new Subaru BRZ/Scion FR-S twins, and the current gen Honda CR-Z, there are really no artfully styled cars on the market right now that scream ‘look at me.’ Those cars I mentioned all looked interesting and had power and driving finesse to back them up. Japan was responsible for many of them, which is where Infiniti comes from, and they appear to feel that American customers don’t need any cake, don’t want cake, or second helping of good looking cars. Yes, the Ford Fusion looks good, but it does not really do anything the old car didn't.
There is what I call an overall aura of “boring-ness” in development studios right now. Cars look the same. They pretty much are the same. How does anything from Cadillac right now look any different than current Hyundais and Kias?
Yes, I just said it, it doesn't. Hyundai and Kia have really been trying too hard with their current, over styled, cross-eyed design language that is the bone I most want to throw. I could go on, but the gist has been made: Detroit and Japan seem to be happy exclusively building cars for the masses, and no more limited edition cars for the few who love cars the most.
I loved it, as well as current Honda enthusiasts.It was and is a marvel of engineering, and if it was updated a bit with a new design and some new nuts and bolts, then it could be a real gem. Add some good looks to the package, or at least a unique brand of Honda design language, and presto—you have a successful, global sporty car. Toyota had the old MR2 as well as the stylish Celica, Chevrolet the Camaro, then nothing, then the Camaro again, Pontiac brought back the GTO, Chrysler had the Crossfire, Dodge had the Magnum, Acura had the RSX sport coupe, et cetera. There has been a death of artful looking cars.
Except for a Porsche or maybe the new Subaru BRZ/Scion FR-S twins, and the current gen Honda CR-Z, there are really no artfully styled cars on the market right now that scream ‘look at me.’ Those cars I mentioned all looked interesting and had power and driving finesse to back them up. Japan was responsible for many of them, which is where Infiniti comes from, and they appear to feel that American customers don’t need any cake, don’t want cake, or second helping of good looking cars. Yes, the Ford Fusion looks good, but it does not really do anything the old car didn't.
There is what I call an overall aura of “boring-ness” in development studios right now. Cars look the same. They pretty much are the same. How does anything from Cadillac right now look any different than current Hyundais and Kias?
Yes, I just said it, it doesn't. Hyundai and Kia have really been trying too hard with their current, over styled, cross-eyed design language that is the bone I most want to throw. I could go on, but the gist has been made: Detroit and Japan seem to be happy exclusively building cars for the masses, and no more limited edition cars for the few who love cars the most.
No comments:
Post a Comment